Tuesday, 17 May 2011

Retro: 2004

One of the most interesting years in mobile phone design, 2004 saw some iconic handsets and also some heroic failures which might just have changed the mobile world for the better if they had taken off.

Motorola

Motorola had a promising year in 2004, breaking new ground in both 3G and fashion phone markets.
The most iconic phone of 2004 (and possibly one of the most iconic phones of all time) was the Motorola RAZR V3, a striking aluminium clad design which was notable for its very slim form factor, although the user interface was notably horrible to use. The RAZR turned around Motorola's flagging fortunes, but a fixation with this type of design almost killed the company.
 
Motorola was also one of the leaders in the 3G market, the Motorola A1000 was a touchscreen smartphone with GPS that came out three years before Apple entered the arena. But 3G sales didn't really take off until much later, and Motorola seemed to lose interest in this market sector. It wasn't helped by the fact that the biggest 3G network in Europe (Hutchison 3) only allowed access to a limited number of "walled garden" sites rather than the whole web.
Back in 2003, Windows Mobile was still thought to be the next big thing and the Motorola MPX220 combined Windows with the then-popular clamshell form factor to come up with a device that looks very strange these days. Despite the clever packaging, it failed to sell in any significant numbers and was plagued with hardware problems.
 
A rather unusual form factor is present in the Motorola V80 with a rotating display that did win quite a few fans. It certainly stood out against Motorola's usual offerings.
Despite these innovations, most of Motorola's sales during 2004 came from their V500 and V600 series of clamshell phones which showed some attractive designs, but they still lacked the ease-of-use of their main rival, Nokia.
From a 2011 perspective, Motorola have struggled to remain a player and now currently almost exclusively active in high-end Android devices.

Nokia

Coming out of a miserable 2003, Nokia spent 2004 trying to win back market share with a scattergun approach to models and designs. Nokia broke with tradition in many respects, something that we are seeing echoed with its struggles in 2011.
 
At the top end of the market, the Nokia 9500 Communicator offered a big screen and QWERTY keyboard, a new version of Symbian and WiFi but for some reason lacked 3G support. The brick-like design and weight put all but the most dedicated of customers off.. and surprisingly it took Nokia three years to replace it. A much smaller version (initially without WiFi), the Nokia 9300 was launched the same year, and it proved to be a popular device despite a lack of high-speed data support.
Launched roughly at the same time as the 9500, the Nokia 7710 touchscreen phone was ahead of its time to the point that the technology couldn't really deliver what users actually wanted. A lack of 3G and a frankly pretty awful display killed off Nokia's touchscreen efforts, and it took four years for them to revisit the market with the Nokia 5800.
 
Handheld gaming consoles are pretty popular these days, but back in 2004 Nokia were also trying to get into the market. A follow-up to the original N-Gage console, the Nokia N-Gage QD was more compact and focussed on games. It's another one of those frustrating cases where the state of contemporary technology wasn't really up to it, and Nokia gave up this approach shortly afterwards.
Despite a lack of 3G in some other high-end devices, Nokia were certainly pushing ahead here with the chubby Nokia 6630. Again, 3G customers were few and far between, but the 6630 was a popular choice for those customers who were using those fledgling 3G networks.
 
Sometimes companies like to experiment, and in the case of the Nokia 7610, Nokia certainly went to town. Trying to break free of the sort of boring monoblock design that Nokia were known for (you know, the sort of phones that people actually bought), Nokia came up with the radical sweeping design of the 7610. The really weird keyboard looked interesting, but the layout was off-putting and was a distraction from the fact that this was a very capable device for its day. Nokia later replaced the keyboard with the supposedly more sober Nokia 6670, which somehow managed to look even uglier.
Also in the weird design club was the Nokia 2650, a short lived cross between a phone and a sun-lounger. A simple and quite usable device, the strange design was certainly eye-catching if nothing else.
 
Novel materials also found themselves into the design of the metal-clad Nokia 6170. Sadly a pretty basic device underneath, the 6170 is probably one of the best looking Nokia handsets that we can remember.
 
Another smart design, this time with a smartphone underneath was the Nokia 6260. A Symbian device with a swivelling screen in a clamshell form factor, the 6260 was certainly interesting to look at. Clamshells were very popular during 2004, although they are quite rare today.

One of the most radical Nokia designs ever was the Nokia 7280 "pen phone". Lacking a keyboard, the 7280 was mostly controlled through a "rotator" and had a small display hidden behind mirrored glass. The pen phone format died out, and these devices are now quite collectable.. although perhaps still not very usable.
 
A sibling to the 7280, the Nokia 7260 was a device that we hated at the time, but in these days of black slabby touchscreen phones, the 7260 is at least interesting to look at. It was an enormously popular phone, although even at the time it was depressingly basic underneath the radical exterior.
Another popular phone, the Nokia 3220 was aimed at the mass-market, but in a funkier package than its predecessors. A good combination of interesting design, light weight and low cost led to this being a very strong seller.
 
Not every Nokia was a radical design. The Nokia 6610i managed to combine dull looks with a pretty unrewarding user experience and a rubbish stills camera tacked onto the back. However, this unappealing and unloved device still managed to sell quite well.. usually to corporate and business customers.

Sony Ericsson

Founded in 2001, Sony Ericsson were beginning to get into their stride by 2004 with some technically advanced and stylish designs. However, as with Motorola, Sony Ericsson have struggled in recent years (partly due to losing focus with dozens of "Walkman" phones) and now focus mainly on high-end Android devices.
 
Following on from the P800 and P900, the Sony Ericsson P910 was a UIQ-based Symbian smartphone with a relatively large touchscreen and a tiny QWERTY keypad. It wasn't much of an upgrade over its predecessors, and the lack of 3G or WiFi in an otherwise advanced device spoiled it. Even so, there was very little to challenge Sony Ericsson at the time, although most phones these days are now touchscreen devices.
 
Going to show that Nokia was not the only firm that could come up attractive mobile phones, the Sony Ericsson T630 followed on from the iconic T610. Again, a basic phone in a pretty package, the T630 was a popular device with a memorable semi-translucent case design.
 
A step up from the T630, the Sony Ericsson K700 marked the beginnings of Sony Ericsson's well regarded K-Series of Camera phones (in Swedish, "Kamera"). A bit smarter and better specified than most rival Nokias, the K700 was one of Sony Ericsson's best-selling phones up to that point.

HTC

Even though HTC didn't sell phones under its own name until 2006, it was already a significant player in the Windows Mobile market, with handsets often turning up with carrier branding or under the i-Mate name.
 
The HTC Blue Angel sold under various names, including the T-Mobile MDA III and the O2 XDA IIs. O2's original XDA was probably the first widely available touchscreen Windows smartphone, launched the previous year and then followed by the XDA II. This device had a 3.5" QVGA touchscreen and WiFi, but the main addition was the slide-out QWERTY keyboard.
 
A more traditional design, the HTC Typhoon sold under different names including the Orange SPV C500 and T-Mobile SDA. Despite running Windows, the Typhoon was quite a basic device.. but at 100 grams in weight, the Typhoon was much lighter than other Windows smartphones.
 
Another device on the market was the HTC Magician, sold as the T-Mobile MDA Compact and under other names. The Magician was a reasonably successful attempt to get a more pocket sized touchscreen phone, even though it had to compromise on features.

Sharp

Remember Sharp? 2004 was probably their best year in Europe with a number of class-leading devices. Despite being ahead of the pack, Sharp never made the breakthrough it needed in Europe and eventually it faded from view.
 
The first phone to break the one megapixel camera barrier, the Sharp GX30 also had a 2.2" QVGA display, better than almost all the competition, plus Bluetooth and a SD card slot. The catch was that you had to be a Vodafone customer to get one.
 
Sharp went several better with the Sharp 902, again exclusive to Vodafone. This was one of the launch devices for Vodafone's 3G network, and this came with the first 2 megapixel camera and a 2.4" QVGA swivelling display. As with other Sharp devices, the display technology took advantage of Sharp's expertise in LCDs. Although the 902 should have been a world-beater, it was very expensive and interest in 3G networks didn't really materialise until some time after the 902 was obsolete.

Unlike the 902, the Sharp GX25 was very successful. Again, Sharp squeezed in a QVGA display and Bluetooth in a very compact package weighing just 90 grams. The GX25 still manages to look quite contemporary even all these years later.

Siemens

Once a major player in the European market, Siemens has almost been forgotten now but did manage to come up with some innovative devices.
 
There's now a small but significant market segment for tough phones, and the Siemens M65 was one of the earliest examples. With a rubber case that was water, shock and dust resistant, the M65 was the sort of thing that could survive a bit of rough treatment.
 
Something that never caught on was the design of the Siemens SK65. It tried to answer the perennial problem of how to fit a QWERTY keyboard in an unusual way - the keyboard rotated out from behind to form a cross shape. Too radical for consumers, the Siemens brand was never very popular with corporate customers either, leading to the SK65 being a very rare device these days.

Other manufacturers

Most large mobile phone companies manage to make the occasional iconic or stand-out device in design terms. Samsung is one of those companies that seems to struggle with this, but perhaps one of the most fondly remembered is the Samsung D500 slider. A cute slider with a decent camera, and one of the first Samsungs to support Bluetooth, the D500 was a huge sales success.
 
Probably the company with the most turbulent history in this industry that we know of is Palm, back in 2004 it was known as PalmOne. PalmOne had badly miscalculated the smartphone market, and was stuck making standalone PDAs which it was becoming apparent was a dead-end market. To get round this, it bought a small manufacturer of PalmOS based smartphones called Handspring, and with it their Treo line of phones. The PalmOne Treo 650 was the first in-house design, and although it was never a huge sales success it was enough to keep PalmOne in business and kept Palm fans happy.
 
Most Japanese phone manufacturers (apart from Sony) no longer have a significant presence in Europe.. but Sanyo probably has one of the shortest histories. An attempt to break into the new 3G market with the Sanyo S750 met with a remarkable lack of success. Although the hardware specification was competitive with rivals, the build quality was questionable and the phone looked a complete mess. Sanyo fixed many of these shortcomings with an upgraded version in 2005, but by then it was too late and they pulled out of the market.
Another Japanese manufacturer that pulled out of Europe, Panasonic were getting increasingly uncompetitive by 2004. The Panasonic X300 is one good example - the X300 had a basic flip-out display, just like a modern digital camcorder, and it was indeed capable of recording video on its basic camera, but there was hardly any internal storage and getting videos off the phone was very difficult. Although there were many other equally poor devices on the market, the flip-out screen raised expectations that the X300 simply could not match.
 
French manufacturer Sagem showed promise in 2004, the Sagem myC-3b being the most memorable device in design terms. For many years, Sagem continued to make cheep and cheerful devices but recently the brand vanished and what was Sagem Mobile now makes OEM devices for other companies.
 
Yet another defunct manufacturer that once showed promise was UK-based Sendo. The cheap but highly usable Sendo P600 was the sort of thing that should have given them a boost. Popular at the time (mostly because of the low cost), Sendo devices like this were often seen but are now mostly forgotten. Sendo's R&D team were snapped up by Motorola, but sadly Motorola closed the division a couple of years later.
NEC were a pioneer of 3G handsets in Europe, and the NEC E228 was a popular model in that market.. but also one of the last phones that NEC would make for Europe. An inexpensive device, it still had video calling and expandable memory, but most Hutchison 3 customers would never use those features. NEC was another Japanese manufacturer to leave the market, this time in 2006.
 
A manufacturer that has done rather well since 2004 is LG. Most notably, LG made "U-series" 3G devices for 3. Early 3G handsets such as the LG U8130 lacked what we would regard as the basics of Bluetooth and expandable memory, but they could access 3's "walled garden" and make video calls. Of course, these days users want unrestricted web access, multimedia on their memory card and don't care much about video calls.. so perhaps it's not surprising that few people really wanted to use 3G when it came out!

In context

Quite a lot of companies demonstrated that they had real vision in 2004, with 3G devices and touchscreen phones pushing technological boundaries.. although there was no real interest from customers. Fashion phones did rather better, and many manufacturers pulled back from their high-tech offerings, which proved to be a mistake in the long run.

Thursday, 4 November 2010

Nokia 7710 (2004)

Announced November 2004
At first glance, the specifications of the Nokia 7710 look very contemporary. A Nokia smartphone with a large 3.5" 640 x 320 pixel touchscreen display, a completely new version of the Symbian operating system plus strong multimedia support, it doesn't sound a million miles away from the new Nokia N8. But this is November 2004, not November 2010.. and the Nokia 7710 is one of Nokia's most notable failures.

This was Nokia's first production touchscreen phone.. and basically the last touchscreen device they made for four years until the Nokia 5800 was released. The 7710 also came two years before the iPhone brought Apple's take on the same idea to market.. and ultimately it was the iPhone and not the 7710 that redefined the smartphone market.

When you look a bit more deeply at the 7710, the reasons for its lack of success are perhaps more obvious. This was a GSM-only device, supporting GPRS and EDGE data with no 3G or WiFi connectivity. Practically, it meant that most customers  Nokia 7710 with mobile TV were limited to download speeds of just 48 Kbps, less than the speed of a dial-up modem. Nokia had introduced their first 3G handset (the Nokia 6600) the previous year, and the Nokia 9500 (also announced in 2004) featured WiFi support. So, it's not as if Nokia couldn't do 3G and WiFi.. they just didn't do it with the 7710, a move that effectively crippled it.

There were other problems as well. The 7710 was hampered by a slow 168MHz processor, fairly typical for the time but really quite underpowered for a big screen smartphone like this. The 7710 also had limited internal memory, but again the technological limitations of handsets from this era really made that inevitable, and Moore's Law usually helps to fix most performance problems. One of the big differences between the 7710 and the original iPhone is that the iPhone had access to much more modern componentry, especially a significantly faster processor.

The price tag of €500 before tax and subsidy also made this an expensive phone, combined with quite a few rough edges on the Series 90 operating system and a not terribly good display, the 7710 pretty much bombed in sales terms. A number of 7710s were retro-fitted with DVB-H receivers to pilot free-to-air mobile TV, but other than that the handset virtually vanished.

Given that there was obviously real consumer demand for a phone like this, at the time being met by the likes of the HTC Blue Angel and the Sony Ericsson P910i, then you would expect that Nokia would pick themselves up, dust themselves down.. and come up with something better. But in fact, Nokia cancelled the entire project and operating system and didn't return to the touchscreen market for another four years.

The repercussions of the 7710's cancellation are still being felt today. Although some of the work done on this phone was folded back into mainstream S60 devices and carried forward into Maemo (eventually leading to the N900), Nokia effectively wasted the chance to be the market leader in touchscreen smartphones.

These days the Nokia 7710 is quite collectable due to its rarity and unusual design for the period, typically selling for €200 or so in good condition.. although given its flawed design it is unlikely that anybody still uses one as their everyday phone!

Monday, 20 July 2009

Nokia 6300 (2007)

Launched 2007


This month we say goodbye to an old friend - after two and a half years as one of Europe's best-selling phones, the Nokia 6300 has finally been discontinued.

In the world of mobile phones, the 6300 is positively ancient. Most handsets are launched and them forgotten within a year, and yet the Nokia 6300 still remains very much in demand. On paper, the 6300 isn't that impressive.. so what gives?

There are several elements that we think contribute to the 6300's success. Firstly, this is a very attractive looking phone with a smart, understated design that appeals to many consumers. The 6300 uses high-quality materials, including stainless steel, in its build which gives the handset a very solid "well built" feel.

The Nokia 6300 is easy to use, with a simple keypad layout and the tried-and-tested Series 40 interface. The clear, 2" QVGA display also makes using the 6300 straightforward.
There's an MP3 player, FM radio, microSD expandable memory, Bluetooth and USB connectivity. There's a 2007-era web browser and email client as well.

The phone is not without its faults. The 2 megapixel camera is pretty basic, the 6300 lacks 3G and the small battery only gives 3.5 hours talktime. The replacement 6303 Classic is much better, although the Nokia 6700 Classic is probably a better replacement all around.

Not only is it a popular phone, it is a very good benchmark when comparing to other devices. Retailing at about €110 SIM-free, the 6300 is a quality handset for not very much money.. and it's the phone that other manufacturers have to beat.

Expect to see the 6300 around for a little while yet in the retail channel, although it's quite likely that remaining stocks will vanish quite quickly. But as we feel that the 6300 is a handset that many consumers are very happy with, we're sure that you will often catch site of one for years to come.

Nokia 6300 at a glance
Available:
Q1 2007
Network:
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 or
GSM 850 / 1800 / 1900
Data:
GPRS + EDGE
Screen:
2", 240 x 320 pixels, 16m colours
Camera:
2 megapixels
Size:
Medium monoblock
106 x 44 x 13mm / 91 grams
Bluetooth:
Yes
Memory card:
MicroSD
Infra-red:
No
Polyphonic:
Yes
Java:
Yes
GPS:
No
OS:
Series 40
Battery life:
3.5 hours talk / 14 days standby

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

Motorola 4500X (1980s)

It's easy to forget just how awful mobile phones used to be - but one look at the Motorola 4500X serves as a reminder that mobile phones were once something that you really didn't want to carry around unless you had to.

Dating from the late 1980s (we believe that our model is a Vodafone UK device from 1988), the 4500X was a massive 3.5kg device which was basically a handset connected to a heavy box containing the battery and electronics via a curly cord. The unit measures 260mm long by 118mm wide by 175mm tall (270mm if you count the antenna). This type of phone was known as a "hand portable" and it was just one step up from a car phone. 

The handset itself had a basic set of numeric buttons and some function keys, with a very simple LED display for output. There are no letters on the keys, because text messaging was still to come.
 Motorola 4500X with Motorola FONE F3 It wasn't the first commercially available phone - that was another Motorola handset, the DynaTAC (which we spoofed a few years ago for April Fool's Day) - but the 4500X wasn't much more advanced, the real innovation was the curly cord that meant you didn't have to strain yourself too much while talking on the phone.

It's hard to get an idea of just how big these things were - so on the left we have included a Motorola FONE F3 as a comparison. Even though the FONE F3 is about the most basic phone on the market today, it is still much more powerful than the 4500X. And at just 70 grams, it comes in at just 2% of the weight of its ancestor.

Surely something the size of the 4500X must have had something going for it? What about battery life? Nope - maximum talktime was perhaps an hour, and the 4500X needed pretty much continual charging to keep it going. People who had to use one of these things needed to plug it into their in-car charger between site visits to try to keep the thing going.

What about call quality? With a big antenna like that, surely the Motorola 4500X must have had crystal clear calls? Nope - this ran on the old analogue ETACS system which was appalling, no matter how big the antenna might be.

In fact, the Motorola 4500X was the last of the first generation of mobile phones. Shortly after the 4500X and its contemporaries, Motorola came out with the MicroTAC which weighed in at "just" 350 grams which started the trend for phones to become ever smaller, leading in time to the StarTAC which more-or-less defined the shape and size of a modern clamshell. The "curly cord" phone didn't die though, it evolved into the Bag Phone which is still available today.. the latest incarnation is the Motorola M900 Bag Phone.

You might note that all of these early handsets were from Motorola - Nokia didn't really make much of an impact in the early days and Motorola was regarded as the main innovator in the mobile phone industry. Times change.

You can see more of the Motorola 4500X and some contemporary office equipment in our gallery.

Motorola 4500X at a glance
Available:
Late 1980s
Network:
ETACS
Data:
No
Screen:
10 numeric LEDs
Camera:
No
Size: Massive
260 x 118 x 175mm / 3500 grams
Bluetooth: No
Memory card: No
Infra-red: No
Polyphonic: No
Java: No
GPS: No
Battery life: 1 hour talktime approximately

Wednesday, 10 December 2008

Nokia 8310 (2001)

Probably one of the cutest handsets ever made, the Nokia 8310 was launched in 2001 at roughly the same time as the Nokia 6310. But the key thing with this phone was that it was an 8000-series device, and as today that indicates an expensive and very desirable mobile phone.
What the Nokia 8310 had going for it was its relatively small size at just 97 x 43 x 19mm and 84 grams in weight. Contemporary phones (such as the 6310) were significantly bigger and heavier. It was not just size that set the 8310 apart, it also had interchangeable translucent covers and special lighting effects that marked it out as a high-fashion item.

At launch, the 8310 was very expensive - coming in at the equivalent of €600 or £400 for a SIM-free phone. Even for 2001, the 8310's specifications were a bit basic, with an 84 x 48 pixel monochrome display, no Bluetooth or camera and only monophonic ringtones.. although the 8310 was a very early phone to feature a built-in FM radio, voice commands and predictive text messaging. It was also one of the first phones to come with GPRS, although exactly what you were meant to do with it on such a basic handset is unclear.

The striking physical design gave the phone plenty of "wow factor", and the 8310 was notable enough to be a newsworthy handset, and it was even seen in movies and TV shows as a suitably impressive accessory.

 Nokia 8310
The Nokia 8310 is quite a collectable phone today - a good reconditioned handset can cost €100 or so. Strangely, Nokia never really came up with a follow-up to the 8310 - a high end ultra-compact version of this would be interesting to see seven years after the original. Perhaps it is time that Nokia came up with something worthy to succeed it?

Nokia 8310 at a glance
Available:
2001
Network:
GSM 900 / 1800
Data:
GPRS
Screen:
84 x 48 pixels, monochrome
Camera:
No
Size: Compact monoblock
97 x 43 x 19mm / 84 grans
Bluetooth: No
Memory card: No
Infra-red: Yes
Polyphonic: No
Java: No
GPS: No
Battery life: 2-4 hours talk / 4-16 days standby

Wednesday, 19 November 2008

Three phones that changed the world, and three phones that didn't

As you may know, Mobile Gazette is five years old. As part of our Retro season, we look back at what we think are the three most influential.. and three most disappointing phones in the past five years.
 

The three most influential phones in the past 5 years..

 

 Motorola RAZR V3 Motorola RAZR V3

It's a familiar sight these days, but back in 2004 the Motorola RAZR V3 was nothing like anything that had gone before. At only 14mm thick, the RAZR was the slimmest phone around, and the use of anodized aluminium in the design made it look amazing. In fact, the RAZR had so much "wow factor", it regularly made the news.

It wasn't the first handset to be called a "fashion phone", but it is certainly one of the most memorable.. and the RAZR V3 sold millions of units. You can still buy them new today for about $100, which is quite a bit cheaper than the original $600 asking price.
 
The RAZR had some drawbacks.. the main one was that it was actually a pretty poor mobile phone underneath the pretty exterior. The user interface was horrible, the phone was slow and the phone didn't have a media player or expandable memory. Really much all the Motorola engineers had done was take the old Motorola V600 (from 2003) and squashed it down into a new case.
Motorola could never repeat the success of the original RAZR, despite coming up with dozens of variations. We caused a stir last year by saying that the RAZR was killing Motorola, and that Motorola's strategy had gone badly wrong.
 
Regardless of these ups and downs, we think that the Motorola RAZR stands out as one of the three most influential phones of the past five years, because it made other manufacturers take a long, hard look at their designs in order to make them more appealing.
 

Nokia N95

Nobody could ever accuse the Nokia N95 of being a fashion phone.. announced in 2006, the N95 defined an entirely new class of handsets that were stuffed with just about every feature you could think of.

Featuring 3.5G support, WiFi, GPS, a superb 5 megapixel camera, a large screen, powerful multimedia player and a clever two-way slider, the N95 was the most advanced phone that we had ever seen.

The N95 demonstrated that there was a market for high-end and expensive mobile phones, and it became the benchmark to beat. Even two years after launch, the N95 is still a very popular phone and there are only a tiny handful of devices that can beat it.
 

 Apple iPhone Apple iPhone

The Apple iPhone was announced early in 2007, and it's a love-it-or-hate-it device. But there's no doubting that it is a highly influential device that has inspired competitors to come out with a raft of "me too" devices.
 
The original iPhone lacked 3G or GPS, had a pretty poor camera and a number of other disappointments.. but it was the most polished phone to date with a fantastic user interface that won admiring glances.. even from those who claimed not to like the thing.
 
One simple measure of how these three phones compare in terms of popularity is a Google search. Looking up "RAZR" gives 28.6 million matches, N95 gives 64 million matches, and iPhone gives an astonishing 337 million matches. Does that make the iPhone more influential than the others? Possibly not.. but it has definitely created the biggest media buzz.

 

Other mentions

 
We didn't count the Nokia 6310i as that is actually six years old.. a phone that was pretty much perfect for its target market. The Sharp 902 defined the modern 3G phone, but was about two years ahead of everyone else. The Sony Ericsson W800 redefined the mobile phone as a serious media player. The Samsung D500 popularised the now common "slider" format.

 

 ..and the three most disappointing phones.

 

 Motorola ROKR E1 Motorola ROKR E1

The phone that both Motorola and Apple hope you had forgotten.. the Motorola ROKR E1 was announced in 2005, following months of speculation about an iTunes-capable phone.
 
Public expectations were high, with all sorts of snazzy conceptual designs combining iPod elements in a mobile phone.. more or less the same concepts that emerged before the iPhone was launched.

The reality was hugely disappointing. The Motorola ROKR E1 was a slightly tweaked version of the Motorola E398 from the previous year. The ROKR E1 could only store 100 tracks, regardless of the size of memory card, and it just didn't look the part.
 
It was a huge flop, despite the fact that it was actually quite a good music phone despite its limitations. The ROKR range still soldiers on today with handsets such as the ROKR E8, but the ROKR has always been a FLOPR compared to the original RAZR.
 

 Nokia 7700 Nokia 7700

Back in 2003, several years before the iPhone, Nokia showed off the Nokia 7700 which featured a large touch-sensitive screen with a specially designed user interface, a multimedia player, camera, email client and pretty much everything that you would expect from a modern touchscreen phone..
 
..except the 7700 was made with technology from 2003, so it was bulky, lacked memory and was slow. Eventually the 7700 was cancelled and replaced with the 7710 which fared little better.
 
Along with the Nokia 6708, these three devices were Nokia's first touchscreen phones, but they spectacularly failed to make any impact on the market whatsover. Perhaps if the 7700 had an Apple badge on, things might have been different.
 

 Panasonic X300 Panasonic X300

If you are going to make a phone that looks like a digital camcorder, then you would expect it to live up to its looks when it came to taking pictures and video clips.
But although the Panasonic X300 looked fantastic with a flip-out screen and side-mounted camera, the truth was that it was utterly rubbish.. even for 2004 when it was launched. When Panasonic's rival Sharp had just launched the first megapixel camera phone in Europe, the X300 was stuck at 0.3 megapixels. Video capture resolution was approximately 120 x 160 pixels and the X300 couldn't even record sound. The X300 didn't have any type of expandable memory and the 3MB available internally was completely inadequate. The only way to get pictures off was an optional and highly proprietary USB cable. On top of that, the pokey 128 x 128 pixel display was utterly inadequate.. and poor quality construction meant that it tended to break.
 
We admit that plenty of other phones from that time period had similar shortcomings, but none were as utterly disappointing as the Panasonic X300, although Panasonic continued to churn out uncompetitive handsets in Europe until the end of 2005 when they gave up. Although Panasonic's other products are excellent, and Panasonic's Japanese phones are quite impressive, their efforts in the European market were surprisingly poor and nobody really misses them.
 

Other mentions

The Sony Ericsson P990 looked good on paper, but bugs and a lack of interest from its manufacturer meant that this promising device never achieved what it could have done. The Siemens Xelibri 6 (and the whole Siemens Xelibri range) was an interesting idea that is still waiting for the right moment. The Motorola MPx220 failed to popularise Windows on ordinary phones. The Nokia 3200 allowed you to make your own covers.. but we're not sure if anyone ever did. The Nokia N91 tried to introduce the hard disk to mobile phones, but failed. The Motorola ZINE ZN5 is one of 2008's most disappointing phones because it comes with a first class camera, but no 3G or GPS.
Who knows what will be memorable in another five years or so.. we hope that we are still around to share!